To illustrate this point by a hypothetical example, two species might seem equidistant, serologically, from a third species. [Please select]
0
It is definitely set apart from this group, however, and its position, serologically, is compatible with that based on evidence from other sources. [Please select]
0
_Passer_ is not, serologically, closely related to any of the birds tested. [Please select]
0
200) that the carduelines are excluded, serologically, from the distinct assemblage formed by the richmondenines, emberizines, and tanagers. [Please select]
0
_Spiza_, serologically, is closely related to all species of the richmondenine-emberizine-thraupid assemblage. [Please select]
0
The Carduelinae are excluded from the assemblage and serologically are most closely related to the Estrildinae. [Please select]
0
The estrildines, serologically, do not closely resemble _Passer_, Subfamily Passerinae, although recent classifications place these two subfamilies in the Family Ploceidae. [Please select]
0
Although this test was one of an earlier series in which difficulties were encountered (the data, therefore, were not used), it is of interest that the two species were almost indistinguishable serologically. [Please select]
0
_Molothrus_, representing a family (Icteridae) recognized as distinct from the Family Fringillidae, also more closely resembles the fringillid assemblage, serologically, than do the carduelines. [Please select]
Do you have a better example in your mind? Please submit your sentence!