If nothing exists but the conscious states of the perceiver, how does he come to think that there is an objective tree at all ? [Please select]
0
For us there is no being except that of the perceiver and the perceived. [Please select]
0
"[269:3] If the objects are "born with" the senses, it follows that they are born with and appertain to the individual perceiver." [Please select]
0
But Locke thinks the qualities so discovered belong in part to the perceiver and in part to the substance outside the mind. [Please select]
0
But it was evident even to the early exponents of this theory that according to such an account, each perceiver is relegated to a world peculiar to his own stand-point. [Please select]
0
Let us now follow the fortunes of the other phase of subjectivism--that which develops the conception of the perceiver rather than the perceived. [Please select]
Do you have a better example in your mind? Please submit your sentence!